Economics


E-checks: Use Cash Locally

Some online retailers are touting the use of e-checks:

This process –… — has been around for a number of years. It’s common among utilities and others that send out monthly bills: They ask for your bank-account number and the “routing” number at the bottom of your checks, then withdraw what you owe when your bill’s due.

For paying directly from my checking account I’ve been pretty happy using a debit card. But the retailers are looking for a bit more:

Retailers wish everyone would pay this way, as it saves them money. Take Fresh Direct LLC, a New York City online grocer. Deputy Chairman Jason Ackerman says the company pays 2.2 percent in fees on the average credit-card transaction, but its new e-check system costs it roughly half that amount.

I think any thoughtful online retailer will look seriously at this kind of savings. But, there may be drawbacks for some consumers:

For consumers, one of the best reasons to avoid e-checks is to keep earning rewards from a credit-card company. Retailers argue that’s short-sighted. As Amazon notes on its site, if more customers were to pay through their bank accounts, Amazon could pass on its savings in the form of lower prices.

Amazon and the others need to incent customers on a per transaction basis if they want broad adaptation. The way to do this is to pass the savings directly to the customer. If a retailer saves a net of 1.1% when customers use an e-check then credit that to the customer on a per transaction basis. In the long run everyone except perhaps the banking and card industry will be better off: retailers become more competive, consumers save some money and the fees charged for using credit/debit cards probably come down (e-check fees may go up).
This is potentially good stuff for online purchases and it would be great to see more of the same when we shop locally. Remember that w hen you are buying in person you can ignore the cards and e-checks and simply pay with cash. This will definitely hit the bottom line of the banking industry and I’m ok with my local stores keeping the difference for a while. I would, though, rather see us getting an automatic discount for cash at the register!
And as to the rewardsmentioned above:

Some credit cards give you 5 percent refunds when you use them at the grocery or drug store.

If these card companies are charging a service fee high enough to give 5% refunds then we should damn well be all over retail outlets to give us discounts for cash!@!


Stay Warm, Stay Healthier

Simply keeping your feet warm may help fend off colds:

But when he and a colleague deliberately chilled subjects — by dipping their feet in ice water — they found that those who got their feet cold and wet were significantly more likely to develop symptoms of a cold over the next four or five days than were those who just put their feet in an empty bowl.

While this study did not look at this it seems reasonable to conclude that folks with circulatory problems that lead to cold extremeties should, if the study is correct, show a higher incidence of colds.
Investors might note an uptick in sales of foot warming devices if this study gets much play in the popular press.


More Medicine

I know some religious folks who will bristle at Scalzi’s sensible views on family management and relationships but they live in dark places and if they are very lucky their sons will not look to be dating Athena:

And as for passing along the “the husband is the head of household” meme to my daughter, well. Here we pause for a long and hearty laugh. I’ve already given Athena permission to kneecap the first jackass who tries to pass that one off to her. And you don’t want to know what Krissy’s given her permission to do.

Chuckle! Read it all.


Looking Forward to a Free Market

Should corporations have to disclose more about their executive pay structure?
Well, if they are public corporations created and supported by state and federal laws then a case can be made that, yes, they should be very transparent. Problably more than Barney Frank proposes.
However, this simply points again to the failure of government created organizations. Every year there are more patchwork bills to regulate corporations and, it seems, we hear more and more about what is not right with them. Let’s solve the problem! Let’s end government protection of corporations and the concept of limited liability corporations. If you are going to play you need to be willing to assume the risk.
And, yes, I disagree with Doug at Below the Beltway who says:

A possible end to the inane idea that so-called “commercial speech” is less deserving of First Amendment protection ?

As noted here when a business is structured like a human then we can consider applying human rights.