bush


What Might be Next?

After reading bush’s poll numbers Tena ponders:

So naturally, one wonders with some fear and trembling just what might happen next. Another attack? Another invasion? Or just a slow slide downward until this 2d term is over? Somehow, I doubt that last scenario, simply because too much is riding on this administration’s success and failure for the rest of the Republicans in office. But that puts the Republicans in an interesting quandary – because the risk that anything like another attack or invasion will backfire on the party is really high.

I have a bit of trouble imagining this last scenario as well. These folks have been building a no one but bush can save us mentality (see last election) and there is no reason to believe that they will not go to extreme lengths to retain power. There are trillions of dollars at stake which is probably more important to them than family values. So they may not care whether an event will help them at the polls or not as long as it facilitates a continuation of the regime through voting if that works and if not then, perhaps, unleashing more of the patriot act will remove any opposition.
Via Skippy.


Perhaps he Does Read…

Especially when it is about how he spent his own time in college.
Don’t get me wrong. I don’t mind the idea that bush is reading this particular book and others in a similar vein. I’d just like to see some evidence that he spends more time reading history, economics, philosophy, history of science, political science, etc. The stuff that leaders as opposed to mob bosses might be expected to read and understand.


Not on My Car and Hopefully Not on Yours

Mithras spoiled my night. No, whoever came up with this spoiled my night.
NB: I do not object at all to christians putting the fish symbol where ever it pleases them; I would have preferred that the folks who embedded Darwin’s name into the fish symbol had chosen some other creature; this, though, is disrespectful of just about everything; it is, well, unAmerican.
Oh, also check out these posts and their comment threads. Warning: language and humor may be offensive to some.


Just War and Proportionality

Professor Bainbridge in the course of an interesting discussion of VE Day and the strategic bombings of German and Japaniese civilian populations notes:

Indeed, there seems little doubt but that the strategic bombing campaign violated the precepts of a just war. In particular, it violated the tenets of proportionality and discrimination. Proportionality holds that the response to aggression should not be disproportionate to the original aggression. Was the deliberate firebombing of Dresden or Hamburg, say, proportional to the Blitz? As for discrimination, there is no doubt that Bomber Harris and his US counterparts deliberately targeted German and Japanese citizens.

So, at point do the Afghani and Iraqi campaigns breach the proportionality principle? When we have killed 3000 of them? Destroyed property in value equal to the WTC buildings and related economic damage? Or, what?


al-qaeda # 3 Captured?

Maybe not!
For a day or so last week it nearly impossilbe to escape from the headlines in the papers, at the top of every hourly newscast, on talk radio, NPR, etc., the story that the #3 dude in al-qaeda had been captured. Great news, right?
The sad part is that equal play will is not being given to the follow up story that this guy was simply part of the flotsam and jetsam of al-qaeda. Nothing number 3 about him.
Spin, Spin, Spin!