Priorities??
Blatantly lifted from Uncommon Thought Journal:

Picture by Rogers. Copyright 2004 Pittsburgh Post- Gazette. From The Oregonian, 3/5/04 B7.
Blatantly lifted from Uncommon Thought Journal:

Picture by Rogers. Copyright 2004 Pittsburgh Post- Gazette. From The Oregonian, 3/5/04 B7.
Well, there is just no agreement in the cheney family these days:
Lynne Cheney, the vice president’s wife and mother of a lesbian, said Sunday that states should have the final say over the legal status of personal relationships.While her position is certainly preferrable to that of her husband I can not, as does Alex Knapp, agree with it.
That stand puts her at odds with the vice president on the need for the constitutional amendment now under debate in the Senate that effectively would ban gay marriage.
I take it that Tom Ridge made this announcement:
Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge said Thursday that there is “credible” information indicating that al-Qaida is moving ahead with plans for a “large-scale attack” in the U.S. aimed at disrupting the November elections.to assist in bush’s effort to squash a House attempt to remove some of the more onerous pieces of the patriot act:
The Republican-led House bowed to a White House veto threat Thursday and stood by the USA Patriot Act, defeating an effort to block the part of the anti-terrorism law that helps the government investigate people’s reading habitsNah, they wouldn’t do anything like that….
Perhaps the bushies* are also working on an obediance drug:
Alongside efforts to reduce the supply and demand of illegal drugs, the federal government has begun pursuing a new tactic, one that expands the drug war battlefield from the Columbian coca farms and the Middle Eastern poppy fields, to a new terrain directly inside the bodies and brains of drug users.As Radley Balko says, this report from the the Center for Cognitive Liberty and Ethics is frightening.
Arthur Silber isn’t very happy with the rulings in Hamdi, Padilla and Rasul:
…as Turley notes, the fact that these questions arose in this form in the first place — questions that lie at the very foundation of what was our original system of government — is a very ominous sign, a sign whose significance a great many people appear not to appreciate fully, if at all.Now I’m not as happy with these rulings as I was two days ago.
…
MORE CONFIRMATION: Of my view — if the Wall Street Journal is pleased about the Supreme Court’s rulings, you can be pretty damned sure that they’re bad news for the defenders of individual rights: