Understanding bush’s speech
Take Back the Media has a post bush speech edition here. Read the speech and then listen to the September 8 edition of TBTM Radio.
Do you agree with their rating of 2 thumbs down?
Via blah3.
Take Back the Media has a post bush speech edition here. Read the speech and then listen to the September 8 edition of TBTM Radio.
Do you agree with their rating of 2 thumbs down?
Via blah3.
Lew Rockwell is a libertarian but I wouldn’t call him a conservative as does Ken Macleod. Ken is right, though, in saying that this is a pretty radical essay:
There is something grossly immoral about a regime that saunters into town, bankrupts its host country and destroys a few others in the process, making mess after mess and still not being held accountable for it. Making matters worse is the reality that it and its friends in industry will take off with all the loot. After all, all this money is going somewhere, and it isn’t to average Iraqis!
Rockwell chews the bushite actions and policies and spits them out in little pieces.
Some of you may not like everything he says but you should, nevertheless, read the entire piece!
In the ongoing deck of cards theme there is now the War Profiteers card deck. Part of their intro:
The War Profiteers Card Deck exposes some of the real war criminals in the US�s endless War of Terror. This is no Sunday bridge club. These are individuals and institutions that stack the deck against democracy in the rigged game of global power.
David Novak, the two of diamonds, is the subject of this post by Major Barbara at Open Source Politics.
Read’m and weep.
Via The Gamer’s Nook.
Well, I just needed to read for a bit more and one answer to the last post’s question pops right up. Per US Arms Control Chief John Bolton:
The U.S.-led invasion of Iraq was justified in part because Saddam Hussein retained scientists capable of building nuclear weapons, Washington’s top arms control official said Thursday.
Atrios interprets it this way:
Now, it appears that the real danger wasn’t that Iraq had WMDs or that they had WMD programs it’s that the sought to have WMD programs.
Bolton presented this revision yesterday. I presume the administration wants to see how this flies before determining how much emphasis to put on this in the Sunday speach.
This may also mean that the expected Kay report looks weak even to the bushies.
President Bush will address the nation Sunday night about Iraq amid growing U.S. casualties and criticism about his handling of the war against terrorism.
Any thoughts what his next revision will be?